Redesigning the business, delivery, and trust in health.
ABOUT THE STANDARD
The Standard sets the precedent for the business of health. For an industry navigating cost, regulation, and a crisis of trust, it is the editorial voice on how to rebuild the business, improve the delivery of care, and restore the community’s confidence. It is written for the billion‐ and million‐dollar organizations accountable for getting it right.
By RaeAnn • Founder & CEO, HLTHWORKS
COVER STORY
The Standard / Article 06
THE ECONOMICS OF HEALTHCARE • NO. 06
Whole-Person Care:
The Benefits Are
Already There
We do not need new benefits to protect HealthSpan. We need to stop administering the ones we already have on separate tracks.
Weaving supplemental, behavioral, and pharmacy into a single care journey makes care more accessible, affordable, and preventive, and the research shows every one of those lowers total cost of care. Collaborative behavioral care returns roughly$6 for every $1 spent; medication adherence cuts CHF costs 23 percent; a $20 ride prevents an ER visit.
Four capitation structures, who captures the upside, and why revising 2027 budgets and designing 2028 contracts around whole-person care is the real fix.
The value-based mechanism that funds whole-person care and holds it accountable. The payoff to the case built across Articles 3 through 6.
READ >>
08
Who Owns Artificial Intelligence?
Ask four executives in the same organization and you will get four answers. Not because they disagree, but because the agenda is attached to people rather than to structures, and the people are moving.
Healthcare has adopted the title faster than it has defined the job. Four organizations using the same two words mean four different things, and the difference is not stylistic. It follows the margin.
The fourth largest company in the world spent a year deliberately getting smaller. Revenue held flat. Operating earnings rose fifty five percent. Wall Street re-rated it.
No Surprises, No Ceiling: The Design Flaw in the Law That Worked
Congress removed the patient from the transaction and left the price to arbitration. Six years later, a federal appeals court has confirmed what the numbers already showed. The failure was in the design.